RDC Coaching

RDC Coaching
Relationship, Dating, and Conflict (RDC) Coaching.
Showing posts with label player. Show all posts
Showing posts with label player. Show all posts

Friday, November 22, 2013

Advice For Short-Term Relationships



I want to open this article by making a statement about ethics as they relate to relationships. At times, ethics can be a controversial topic so I'm going to try to be as P.C. as possible:

Whenever you form a relationship that purposely benefits you more than the other person, you're acting unethically. 

That means, if you purposely lead another person to believe that your relationship with them will be long-term and you only intend to have a short-term relationship, then you are acting unethically. It also means that if you form a competitive relationship with someone who does not stand to gain from a competitive relationship, then you are acting unethically. 

Therefore, using my classification guide, Players, Hogs, and King/Queen-servant relationships are inherently unethical. 80/20, 60/40, 70/30 (etc) relationships are not unethical whereas King-Servant and Queen-servant relationships are; because in an 80/20 relationship the person on the smaller half of the line's interests are being taken care of and they benefit from the relationship. By definition a relationship Hog or Player, by definition, is unethical as well because one person is getting advantage of the other person. 

Not all short-term relationships are unethical. Short-term relationships can be very fulfilling and functional provided that both individuals gain some sort of benefit and both individuals know under what terms the relationship will be ending. Not every relationship that you enter into needs to last forever, but every relationship that you enter into should offer some sort of benefit to you and to the other person. 

The rest of this article I am going to divide into two parts: 1. How to establish ethical Short-term Relationships (STRs), and 2. How to avoid being sucked into Short-term Relationships.

1.  How to establish good, ethical STRs

Acting ethically when you create short-term relationships is important because it will limit the number of problems you run into later on. The last thing you need to have happen is for someone's feelings to get hurt and to make your life miserable from that point on (there are some crazy people out there!) Acting ethically when you form relationships will limit conflict and can actually help you get what you want out of the relationship more easily. 

There are two things you will need to consider when you attempt to form a short term relationship:
First, consider that before you begin to meet your needs you will need to establish an agreement between you and the other person. You will have to indicate to the other person that your relationship with them will eventually end; and you will have to be clear about what you want to gain from your relationship with them.

If you are stuck working on a project with an individual who you don't necessarily like, coming to them openly about how you want to put differences aside so you can focus on your work until the project is over will help you establish an ethical (ceasefire) relationship.
If you and a friend are attracted to one another but don't believe you have long-term potential, then having a conversation with them about how you want to be friends with benefits until one of you finds a new love interest will no only create an ethical short-term relationship, but it will also help you fulfill your wants much sooner and more easily.

Second, you have to realize that even after your relationship has ended, you still run the risk of hurting the other person, or being hurt yourself. The subconscious inclination of most people is that when they invest in a relationship they want it to last. Even though you or they may claim (and be, perfectly happy) to form an STR with you [or them], when they [or you] are actually living through the separation point, they [or you] may change their [your] mind. You risk hurting them, and you risk hurting yourself.
For whatever reason, this risk scares people so much that they avoid telling the other person that they are only around for a short amount of time. It can be uncomfortable living in a short-term relationship where you both know it will end, and our instincts encourage us to retain power (in this case knowledge) over other people so that we ourselves don't get hurt--in which case we are acting unethically. Even when you aren't personally hurt by the parting, the knowledge that you accidentally hurt another individual can cause you to feel hurt as well.
Relationships are always risks, and you have to weigh the benefits against the possible negative outcomes. When you form an STR, you will save yourself a lot of trouble, and stand for maximum gain, if you are upfront with the other person about the ending conditions and you prepare for the possible risks.

2. How to avoid being sucked into STRs

This section is directed to those of us who have been the victim of a Player, had to deal with a relationship Hog, or has ever been stuck in a "whipped" relationship with someone who thought they were a King or a Queen and deserved to take more than we wanted to give them. These kinds of people have a way of sucking us into them and manipulating us, exploiting our weaknesses and ultimately getting more from us than we could ever get from them.

First, let me describe the most common tactics that each of the most common types of unethical individuals use:
Players - A player is anyone who lies or withholds the truth from you in order to lead you along. They may have a secret relationship that they are keeping from you; or they may be aware of things that would prevent them from having a long-term relationship with you such as personality differences, incompatible goals, differences in culture or life circumstance, etc. The primary tactic of the player is to take advantage of your wants and desires by letting you think that you will get your needs and wants met through them, even though they know there is very little chance of that.
Relationship Hogs - A relationship hog is anyone who refuses to bend--refuses to compromise or refuses to collaborate--they expect you to succumb to their will. At first, they don't seem so harmless and the relationship may actually be beneficial, but once you have invested just enough that you can't pull out they start to enforce their will on you. In a conflict, these people will make up every excuse about why they are justified and why you are not. They use hardheaded persistence to get what they want from you and if all else fails they'll do whatever they want to do anyway. Making agreements with them becomes useless because they can't or won't keep those agreements anyway.
The King or Queen - The way that a King or Queen manipulates you is through "low blow" tactics, such as the use of fear, guilt, or any claims to authority they might have over you, such as you own ignorance, use of "the letter of the law" when inappropriate, or tempting you with small doses of the things that you want. Basically anything that you allow them to use against you, they will use against you and they are experts at finding and exploiting those things.

1) The best and first thing you should do to prevent from getting stuck in a relationship with any of these people is to have a plan. Are you in a situation in life where you can reasonably and easily have an ethical, long-term relationship, or are you limited by your finances and life goals? For example, someone who intends to go to medical school will have a harder time forming a long-term romantic relationship than someone who is already started into their career and lives on their own. Be aware of your circumstances and formulate a plan that will lead to your needs and wants. It isn't impossible to form a long-term relationship with other people even when you have a lot of constraints from your goals and circumstances, but you'll have to be aware of those constraints so that you don't mesh with others who are incompatible.

2) The next thing you should do is place personal limits on yourself so that you don't get into difficult situations. I'm not endorsing a narrow minded perspective of dating and relationships, but if there are certain attributes that you will absolutely never settle on with relationships, then avoid situations that encourage those attributes. For example, if you would never be comfortable marrying someone who drinks, don't go to bars to meet people. Some advice: just don't make a long list of things to avoid. Focus on root needs and wants rather than surface needs and wants; for example, some people would never consider marrying a democrat or a republican, but political affiliation is only on the surface, the root need and desire is to not have conflicts and to support one another's decisions. Instead of saying you'll never get along with a democrat or a republican, you should say you would never get along with anyone who argues with you over politics. Plenty of people are capable of having different views than you and still respecting and understanding you and not wanting to argue about them.

3) Follow the old adage, "don't do anything you'll regret later." Before you make any decisions or give of yourself, whether time, money, or otherwise, take some time to consider whether you might feel bad about it later on. If you are giving money, time, or favors to another person in hopes that you'll get something in return that they aren't giving, then you probably need to reconsider giving of yourself in that way. Establish good boundaries and re-establish those boundaries if your relationship starts to slip. Until you have an official conversation about what kind of relationship you both want to build together, don't assume anything. Take conscious risks--ones that you know you are taking and have somewhat control over the outcomes--to progress the relationship rather than assumptive risks--risks that you take because you assume you are in a relationship type that you are not in.

4)  Don't have too thin of skin. Odds are against you that you'll make it through life without having a few bad relationships. You learn from having these  relationships and it becomes easier to discern between the good ones. Don't beat yourself up over having been suckered into a bad relationship, when the relationship ends, try to reflect on the positive side of things--breakups are good because they allow you to adjust your course towards something better.

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Relationship Classification Guide






Classification of Relationships
There are three classifications of relationships:  Long-term Relationships,  Short-term Relationships, and Confused Relationships
Relationships are classified by intent of the individuals. 

Long-term Relationships (LTR)
Any relationship that is intended to last for an unknown period of time, or may never end, is a long-term relationship. LTRs require more investment than STRs.
Examples include: marriage partner, friends, birth-family, neighbors, club members, co-workers and community members.

Short-term Relationships (STR)
Any relationship that is not intended to last or has a known ending date or expected termination condition is a short-term relationship. STRs require less investment than LTRs.
Examples include: summer camp friends, project members, summer flings, cruise ship mates, salesmen.

Confused Relationships (CR)
Since we are talking about intent, not longevity, some relationships are formed where one person intends for the relationships to be a short-term relationship and the other person wishes to have a long-term relationship. I call these relationships Confused Relationships.


Types of Relationships
There are 3 types of relationships; relationships are typified by what they are founded on, whether competition, compromise, or collaboration:

Competitive Relationships - Relationships founded on one individual benefiting above the other individual(s). This kind of relationship offers the very minimal in the hopes of gaining more than is invested; or a relationship in which the investment given, at least to the investor, is trivial and the things they gain are substantial. This type of relationship approaches the other person in hopes of a win-lose outcome. Often times a tug-of-war ensues in this kind of relationship and power switches hands back and forth in a virtual stalemate.

Compromising Relationships - Relationships founded on limiting the roles and powers of each individual so that they don't interfere with the other person's separate agendas. In this kind of relationship, both parties give up a little resulting in a lose-lose outcome. This type of relationship is "safe" because it prevents undue conflicts and frees people up to do their own thing. When one person becomes too powerful, he or she is expected to refrain from using his or her power selfishly. This type of relationship is often, mistakenly, seen as the ideal.

Collaborative Relationships - Relationships founded on genuine mutual benefit. This type of relationship focuses on accomplishing the root objectives of both individuals. Although there may be goals and desires on the surface that are not fulfilled, the basic needs and wants the drive those surface desires are fulfilled exceptionally.


The Relationship Matrix
There are several functioning forms of the combination between relationship type and relationship classification.

Competitive LTRsThe 80/20 Relationship, Rivals, King/Queen-Servant
Compromising LTRsThe 50/50 Relationship, Same house-different worlds
Collaborative LTRsHappily ever after, Eternal Friends
Competitive STRsThe Player, The Hog
Compromising STRsThe Ceasefire
Collaborative STRsFriends with benefits

Definitions:
The 80/20 Relationship - A relationship in which one person makes all the decisions and/or does all the hard work to keep the relationship alive and the other person accepts what the other person does. The person with 80% of the power stays because they have the control, the other person doesn't leave because their superior is looking out for their best interests. (The politician does what is best for his party)
The Rivals - Each individual takes a turn holding the power while the other person succumbs to their demands. (The two sports stars dominate the spotlight as they try to outdo one another)
King/Queen-Servant - Similar to the 80/20 except that the servant stays because he or she fears life without the relationship even though he or she might not be getting all of his or her needs met. He or she is essentially trading needs, wants and desires for security. (The young adult doesn't disobey the parents because she fears being kicked out)
The 50/50 Relationship - Each individual takes turns making decisions and picking up where the other person slacks however neither is permitted to meet selfish desires without the other person meeting their own selfish desires. (The husband gets to go golfing if the wife gets to go to the spa)
Same House-Different Worlds - Both individuals fulfill their roles in the relationship but only do the bare minimum so that they can focus on their personal interests. It is common for neither individual to know, or care, what their counterpart is doing.  (The wealthy businessman and his distant wife)
Happily Ever After - Each individual meets the needs that their counterpart cannot meet and helps their counterpart obtain their wants. The necessary trait of this type of relationship is having compatible wants/needs.
Eternal Friends - The individuals meet nearly all of their needs by themselves but where they fall short their counterpart picks up the slack. The two individuals could be completely different, but their desire to stay together and their ability to selflessly pick up the slack allows their relationship to excel.
The Player - Seeks after his or her wants and needs unethically by taking advantage of the large investment of others. (Since forming relationships require an investment, the player tricks his or her counterpart into investing heavily while only investing minimally himself or herself and then walking away)
The Hog - One individual positions himself to hog all of the benefits leaving none for the other individual. (This relationship isn't sustainable and ends when the benefits dry up)
The Ceasefire - When both individuals are forced to have a relationship with one another and agree to rules and terms that prevent them from tearing each other apart. (Ceasefire ends at the end of a project or after the task at hand is completed)
Friends with Benefits - When both individuals plan on their relationship eventually ending and so agree to meet the needs of the other person as their own needs are met. (This relationship ends when a mutually agreed upon termination point is reached)

It is my philosophy that the best relationships are collaborative; however, collaborative relationships require more work and more energy than any other kind of relationship. The effort you put into building a collaborative relationship is well worth it.